diff options
author | Tavian Barnes <tavianator@tavianator.com> | 2022-03-26 16:34:53 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tavian Barnes <tavianator@tavianator.com> | 2022-03-26 16:55:17 -0400 |
commit | 5026a144add526567771a75b414a4d9873054620 (patch) | |
tree | 3da3c1e7fe7dc8d0a2015b088de229a122328cc6 /opt.c | |
parent | d0565f9830b483d8f307e966e22fde01478b26df (diff) | |
download | bfs-5026a144add526567771a75b414a4d9873054620.tar.xz |
opt: Warn about expressions we remove while optimizing
Diffstat (limited to 'opt.c')
-rw-r--r-- | opt.c | 136 |
1 files changed, 108 insertions, 28 deletions
@@ -51,7 +51,9 @@ #include <limits.h> #include <stdarg.h> #include <stdbool.h> +#include <stdint.h> #include <stdio.h> +#include <string.h> #include <unistd.h> static char *fake_and_arg = "-a"; @@ -318,7 +320,7 @@ struct opt_state { /** Log an optimization. */ BFS_FORMATTER(3, 4) -static bool debug_opt(const struct opt_state *state, int level, const char *format, ...) { +static bool opt_debug(const struct opt_state *state, int level, const char *format, ...) { assert(state->ctx->optlevel >= level); if (bfs_debug(state->ctx, DEBUG_OPT, "${cyn}-O%d${rs}: ", level)) { @@ -332,6 +334,78 @@ static bool debug_opt(const struct opt_state *state, int level, const char *form } } +/** Warn about an expression. */ +static void opt_vwarning(const struct opt_state *state, const struct bfs_expr *expr, const char *format, va_list args) { + if (bfs_expr_has_children(expr)) { + if (expr->lhs) { + va_list copy; + va_copy(copy, args); + opt_vwarning(state, expr->lhs, format, copy); + va_end(copy); + } + + if (expr->rhs) { + opt_vwarning(state, expr->rhs, format, args); + } + + return; + } + + if (expr->synthetic) { + return; + } + + const struct bfs_ctx *ctx = state->ctx; + if (!bfs_warning_prefix(ctx)) { + return; + } + + size_t offset = 0; + size_t start = SIZE_MAX, end = SIZE_MAX; + for (size_t i = 0; ctx->argv[i]; ++i) { + if (i > 0) { + cfprintf(ctx->cerr, " "); + offset += 1; + } + + if (expr->argv == &ctx->argv[i]) { + start = offset; + } + + cfprintf(ctx->cerr, "%s", ctx->argv[i]); + offset += strlen(ctx->argv[i]); + + if (&expr->argv[expr->argc - 1] == &ctx->argv[i]) { + end = offset; + } + } + cfprintf(ctx->cerr, "\n"); + + assert(start <= offset); + assert(end <= offset); + + bfs_warning_prefix(ctx); + for (size_t i = 0; i < end; ++i) { + if (i < start) { + fputc(' ', stderr); + } else { + fputc('~', stderr); + } + } + fputc('\n', stderr); + + bfs_vwarning(ctx, format, args); +} + +/** Warn about an expression. */ +BFS_FORMATTER(3, 4) +static void opt_warning(const struct opt_state *state, const struct bfs_expr *expr, const char *format, ...) { + va_list args; + va_start(args, format); + opt_vwarning(state, expr, format, args); + va_end(args); +} + /** Extract a child expression, freeing the outer expression. */ static struct bfs_expr *extract_child_expr(struct bfs_expr *expr, struct bfs_expr **child) { struct bfs_expr *ret = *child; @@ -367,7 +441,7 @@ static struct bfs_expr *optimize_or_expr(const struct opt_state *state, struct b * Apply De Morgan's laws. */ static struct bfs_expr *de_morgan(const struct opt_state *state, struct bfs_expr *expr, char **argv) { - bool debug = debug_opt(state, 1, "De Morgan's laws: %pe ", expr); + bool debug = opt_debug(state, 1, "De Morgan's laws: %pe ", expr); struct bfs_expr *parent = negate_expr(expr, argv); if (!parent) { @@ -446,18 +520,18 @@ static struct bfs_expr *optimize_not_expr(const struct opt_state *state, struct int optlevel = state->ctx->optlevel; if (optlevel >= 1) { if (rhs == &bfs_true) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "constant propagation: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, &bfs_false); + opt_debug(state, 1, "constant propagation: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, &bfs_false); bfs_expr_free(expr); return &bfs_false; } else if (rhs == &bfs_false) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "constant propagation: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, &bfs_true); + opt_debug(state, 1, "constant propagation: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, &bfs_true); bfs_expr_free(expr); return &bfs_true; } else if (rhs->eval_fn == eval_not) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "double negation: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs->rhs); + opt_debug(state, 1, "double negation: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs->rhs); return extract_child_expr(expr, &rhs->rhs); } else if (bfs_expr_never_returns(rhs)) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "reachability: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs); + opt_debug(state, 1, "reachability: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs); return extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->rhs); } else if ((rhs->eval_fn == eval_and || rhs->eval_fn == eval_or) && (rhs->lhs->eval_fn == eval_not || rhs->rhs->eval_fn == eval_not)) { @@ -503,16 +577,16 @@ static struct bfs_expr *optimize_and_expr(const struct opt_state *state, struct int optlevel = ctx->optlevel; if (optlevel >= 1) { if (lhs == &bfs_true) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "conjunction elimination: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs); + opt_debug(state, 1, "conjunction elimination: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs); return extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->rhs); } else if (rhs == &bfs_true) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "conjunction elimination: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, lhs); + opt_debug(state, 1, "conjunction elimination: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, lhs); return extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->lhs); } else if (lhs->always_false) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "short-circuit: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, lhs); + opt_debug(state, 1, "short-circuit: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, lhs); return extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->lhs); } else if (lhs->always_true && rhs == &bfs_false) { - bool debug = debug_opt(state, 1, "strength reduction: %pe <==> ", expr); + bool debug = opt_debug(state, 1, "strength reduction: %pe <==> ", expr); struct bfs_expr *ret = extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->lhs); ret = negate_expr(ret, &fake_not_arg); if (debug && ret) { @@ -520,7 +594,7 @@ static struct bfs_expr *optimize_and_expr(const struct opt_state *state, struct } return ret; } else if (optlevel >= 2 && lhs->pure && rhs == &bfs_false) { - debug_opt(state, 2, "purity: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs); + opt_debug(state, 2, "purity: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs); return extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->rhs); } else if (lhs->eval_fn == eval_not && rhs->eval_fn == eval_not) { return de_morgan(state, expr, expr->lhs->argv); @@ -572,16 +646,16 @@ static struct bfs_expr *optimize_or_expr(const struct opt_state *state, struct b int optlevel = ctx->optlevel; if (optlevel >= 1) { if (lhs->always_true) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "short-circuit: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, lhs); + opt_debug(state, 1, "short-circuit: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, lhs); return extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->lhs); } else if (lhs == &bfs_false) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "disjunctive syllogism: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs); + opt_debug(state, 1, "disjunctive syllogism: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs); return extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->rhs); } else if (rhs == &bfs_false) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "disjunctive syllogism: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, lhs); + opt_debug(state, 1, "disjunctive syllogism: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, lhs); return extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->lhs); } else if (lhs->always_false && rhs == &bfs_true) { - bool debug = debug_opt(state, 1, "strength reduction: %pe <==> ", expr); + bool debug = opt_debug(state, 1, "strength reduction: %pe <==> ", expr); struct bfs_expr *ret = extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->lhs); ret = negate_expr(ret, &fake_not_arg); if (debug && ret) { @@ -589,7 +663,7 @@ static struct bfs_expr *optimize_or_expr(const struct opt_state *state, struct b } return ret; } else if (optlevel >= 2 && lhs->pure && rhs == &bfs_true) { - debug_opt(state, 2, "purity: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs); + opt_debug(state, 2, "purity: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs); return extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->rhs); } else if (lhs->eval_fn == eval_not && rhs->eval_fn == eval_not) { return de_morgan(state, expr, expr->lhs->argv); @@ -637,12 +711,13 @@ static struct bfs_expr *ignore_result(const struct opt_state *state, struct bfs_ if (optlevel >= 1) { while (true) { if (expr->eval_fn == eval_not) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "ignored result: %pe --> %pe\n", expr, expr->rhs); + opt_debug(state, 1, "ignored result: %pe --> %pe\n", expr, expr->rhs); expr = extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->rhs); } else if (optlevel >= 2 && (expr->eval_fn == eval_and || expr->eval_fn == eval_or || expr->eval_fn == eval_comma) && expr->rhs->pure) { - debug_opt(state, 2, "ignored result: %pe --> %pe\n", expr, expr->lhs); + opt_debug(state, 2, "ignored result: %pe --> %pe\n", expr, expr->lhs); + opt_warning(state, expr->rhs, "The result of this expression is ignored.\n\n"); expr = extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->lhs); } else { break; @@ -650,7 +725,8 @@ static struct bfs_expr *ignore_result(const struct opt_state *state, struct bfs_ } if (optlevel >= 2 && expr->pure && expr != &bfs_false) { - debug_opt(state, 2, "ignored result: %pe --> %pe\n", expr, &bfs_false); + opt_debug(state, 2, "ignored result: %pe --> %pe\n", expr, &bfs_false); + opt_warning(state, expr, "The result of this expression is ignored.\n\n"); bfs_expr_free(expr); expr = &bfs_false; } @@ -671,14 +747,15 @@ static struct bfs_expr *optimize_comma_expr(const struct opt_state *state, struc lhs = expr->lhs = ignore_result(state, lhs); if (bfs_expr_never_returns(lhs)) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "reachability: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, lhs); + opt_debug(state, 1, "reachability: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, lhs); + opt_warning(state, expr->rhs, "This expression is unreachable.\n\n"); return extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->lhs); } else if ((lhs->always_true && rhs == &bfs_true) || (lhs->always_false && rhs == &bfs_false)) { - debug_opt(state, 1, "redundancy elimination: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, lhs); + opt_debug(state, 1, "redundancy elimination: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, lhs); return extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->lhs); } else if (optlevel >= 2 && lhs->pure) { - debug_opt(state, 2, "purity: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs); + opt_debug(state, 2, "purity: %pe <==> %pe\n", expr, rhs); return extract_child_expr(expr, &expr->rhs); } } @@ -812,7 +889,8 @@ static struct bfs_expr *optimize_expr_recursive(struct opt_state *state, struct state->facts_when_false = state->facts; if (optlevel >= 2 && facts_are_impossible(&state->facts)) { - debug_opt(state, 2, "reachability: %pe --> %pe\n", expr, &bfs_false); + opt_debug(state, 2, "reachability: %pe --> %pe\n", expr, &bfs_false); + opt_warning(state, expr, "This expression is unreachable.\n\n"); bfs_expr_free(expr); expr = &bfs_false; goto done; @@ -900,7 +978,8 @@ static struct bfs_expr *optimize_expr_recursive(struct opt_state *state, struct if (facts_are_impossible(&state->facts_when_true)) { if (expr->pure) { - debug_opt(state, 2, "data flow: %pe --> %pe\n", expr, &bfs_false); + opt_debug(state, 2, "data flow: %pe --> %pe\n", expr, &bfs_false); + opt_warning(state, expr, "This expression is always false.\n\n"); bfs_expr_free(expr); expr = &bfs_false; } else { @@ -909,7 +988,8 @@ static struct bfs_expr *optimize_expr_recursive(struct opt_state *state, struct } } else if (facts_are_impossible(&state->facts_when_false)) { if (expr->pure) { - debug_opt(state, 2, "data flow: %pe --> %pe\n", expr, &bfs_true); + opt_debug(state, 2, "data flow: %pe --> %pe\n", expr, &bfs_true); + opt_warning(state, expr, "This expression is always true.\n\n"); bfs_expr_free(expr); expr = &bfs_true; } else { @@ -925,7 +1005,7 @@ done: /** Swap the children of a binary expression if it would reduce the cost. */ static bool reorder_expr(const struct opt_state *state, struct bfs_expr *expr, double swapped_cost) { if (swapped_cost < expr->cost) { - bool debug = debug_opt(state, 3, "cost: %pe <==> ", expr); + bool debug = opt_debug(state, 3, "cost: %pe <==> ", expr); struct bfs_expr *lhs = expr->lhs; expr->lhs = expr->rhs; expr->rhs = lhs; @@ -1043,7 +1123,7 @@ int bfs_optimize(struct bfs_ctx *ctx) { mindepth = INT_MAX; } ctx->mindepth = mindepth; - debug_opt(&state, 2, "data flow: mindepth --> %d\n", ctx->mindepth); + opt_debug(&state, 2, "data flow: mindepth --> %d\n", ctx->mindepth); } if (optlevel >= 4 && maxdepth < ctx->maxdepth) { @@ -1051,7 +1131,7 @@ int bfs_optimize(struct bfs_ctx *ctx) { maxdepth = INT_MIN; } ctx->maxdepth = maxdepth; - debug_opt(&state, 4, "data flow: maxdepth --> %d\n", ctx->maxdepth); + opt_debug(&state, 4, "data flow: maxdepth --> %d\n", ctx->maxdepth); } return 0; |